🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest is no longer a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a privilege that authorities grant or deny as they see fit. This constitutes the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate when and where protests can take place, with possible prison sentences for those who disobey these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous governments had already weakened this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which global rights bodies had condemned as "significant and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental attacks on liberty have effectively eliminated the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Tragedy to Justify Crackdown

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by citing last week's terrible anti-Jewish attack on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be widespread consensus that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, using this atrocity as a justification to stifle dissent is not only disconnected to that duty but perverts it.

"If you cannot draw the line at mass killing, you likely cannot establish limits at democratic principles," observed a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their time, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Present Situation

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's actually occurring: Israel – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have characterized as genocide. Its warfare have led the global justice body to release arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

International public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens think Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would support a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and back the arrest of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially failed the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a despicable anti-Jewish attack to attempt to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government seems included in this attempt. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly questioned for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a point where law enforcement can suggest that demonstrations opposing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have stated that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "implicated" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the horrific toll from 24 months of daily atrocities that have taken many thousands of lives. British political leaders and news organizations have barely concealed the limited value they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest expressions of discrimination in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a concerning boundary by banning Palestine Action, a non-violent, anti-genocide activist collective. Thousands of British protesters have been arrested, mostly for carrying placards opposing genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those detained are pensioners; among them a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "connected to" other nations, while the current president characterized such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to control opposition. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to secure our freedoms. We may ultimately rue how casually we allowed them to be eroded.