🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots added later and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for him, where the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year went for the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He has 50.4% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he does because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island with a high participation. I believe occurred significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. So there was a little resistance. However no, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.