🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed order, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to use a revised congressional map that could add up to five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, released on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to set aside a district court's ruling that had invalidated the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disrupting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in justifying its ruling.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters by their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the boundaries. It had mandated the state to employ the districts created after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

Through a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's decision. She contended that it disregarded the work of the district court, noting that its decision was crafted by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a infraction of the constitution.

National Redistricting Struggle

The court's action comes amid a national fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican majority. Usually, boundary revision happens after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that could add a number of more conservative seats. Democrats, for their part, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Political Reactions

The Texas top lawyer praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures representation supportive of his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

In contrast, Democratic leaders lamented the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic figure stated the court had another time shredded its legitimacy by approving a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.