🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands a PhD in healthcare.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on a recent study, the average family pays $27,000 each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages pays approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you compare that with what the typical US resident spends. I can name multiple clients that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that government play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with increased taxation required, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect amid current situation is that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.